ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription to the ECPR Methods School offers and updates newsletter has been successful.

Discover ECPR's Latest Methods Course Offerings

We use Brevo as our email marketing platform. By clicking below to submit this form, you acknowledge that the information you provided will be transferred to Brevo for processing in accordance with their terms of use.

Introduction to Process Tracing

Course Dates and Times

Monday 17 – Friday 21 February 2019, 09:00 – 12:30
15 hours over five days

Hilde van Meegdenburg

h.van.meegdenburg@fsw.leidenuniv.nl

Departments of Political Science and Public Administration, Universiteit Leiden

Process Tracing (PT) is a within-case method that focuses on tracing causal mechanisms – the actual 'link' between a trigger (conventionally called the x) and an outcome (y). This course will introduce you to the essentials of this method, its main underlying assumptions, and its applicability.

We will discuss what causal mechanisms are, how we can 'trace' them, and what kind of causal inferences we can draw on the bases of a process-tracing study. Moreover, to position PT in the broader methodological field we will look at how PT relates to, but differs from, other (larger- and small-N) case study methods and discuss what understanding of causality underlies process-tracing.

This introduction to PT will take a hands-on approach, applying the new insights to concrete examples and, when possible, to participants' own research projects.

You will get the most from this course if you can use parts of your own research during the exercises.

I expect you to have read the indicated literature, and to have familiarised yourself with case study methods more broadly and process tracing in particular.


Tasks for ECTS credits

2 credits (pass or fail) Attend the course and participate fully in in-class activities. Carry out the necessary reading and/or other work prior to and after classes.

3 credits Hand in daily assignments by 16:00 – short assignments in which you are asked to apply the lessons of the day to your own research project.

4 credits Take-home assignment to be handed in three weeks after the Winter School – a research proposal of max. 10 pages based on a PT design.
 


Instructor Bio

Hilde van Meegdenburg is an Assistant Professor of International Relations at the Institute of Political Science, Leiden University. Her research focuses on international security and state foreign policy-making with a particular focus on the organisation of foreign aid and military interventions. 

Hilde has taught numerous advanced and introductory courses on process tracing and qualitative case studies throughout Europe. 

She is currently co-authoring a book with Patrick A. Mello on how to combine Process Tracing methods with Qualitative Comparative Analysis, under contract with Palgrave Macmillan.

Twitter  @Hildemeeg

This course will give you an understanding of the foundations of PT methods, along with the practical insights and research tools to enable you to use PT in your own research.

The promise of PT as a methodological tool is that it enables the researcher to study more-or-less directly the causal mechanism(s) linking a trigger to a particular outcome, allowing us to open up the ‘black box’ of causality itself. 

In political science, PT is arguably the only method that allows us to study causal mechanisms and to understand how a trigger produces an outcome, instead of simply studying correlations and associations. PT is therefore an ‘…invaluable method that should be included in every researcher’s repertoire.’ (George and Bennett 2005:224).


Day 1

We start by differentiating PT from other methods; including large-n quantitative, frequentist methods but also other small-n methods such as analytical narratives, comparative case studies, congruence, etc. Here we define PT by the interest in studying causal mechanisms in single case studies, and we discuss the three variants of PT: theory-testing, theory-building, and explaining outcome PT. 

Day 2

We look closely at what causal mechanisms are and go into some detail about the ontological and epistemological assumptions underlying PT. Most importantly, we will talk about causal mechanisms as made up out of entities engaging in activities ensuring the productive continuity in which we are interested. 

Day 3

We talk about 'concepts' and their causal attributes in PT. To give you an idea of the type of question we will aim to answer on this day, think about the following in relation to the Democratic Peace theory: What is it about democracy that causes peace (i.e. what are the causal properties of this concept)? 

Day 4

Dedicated to causal mechanism in practice. We go into more detail about how to draw a causal inference on the basis a of single case study and how to execute a PT project.

Day 5

We make time for some presentations (max. 5) of your own causal mechanisms and PT projects. We'll also go into detail about case selection, generalisation, and the (im)possibilities of combining PT with other methods.


By the end of the course, you will have gained insights into the recent debate on the role of causal mechanism in political science, and have all the basics of the PT method. 

Some background knowledge of qualitative case study methods would be helpful, including a rudimentary understanding of set-theory and the possibilities and limits of comparative case studies.

‘I could hardly think of a better way to introduce PhD and postdoctoral students to process tracing methods. A nicely balanced, well paced mix of theoretical and practical classes, homework assignments that have great added value for your own research, all expertly guided and explained by Rasmus and his enthusiastic teaching assistant. Recommended!’ Niels Gheyle, Ghent University
Attended the course taught by Rasmus Brun Pedersen at the 2019 Summer School in Budapest
Day Topic Details
1 What is process tracing?

09:00 –12:30 (incl. coffee break)
Introduction and lecture

2 Causal mechanisms

09:00 –12:30 (incl. coffee break)
Lecture, assignment and discussion

3 Concepts and conceptualisation

09:00 –12:30 (incl. coffee break)
Lecture, assignment and discussion

4 Causal mechanisms in practice

09:00 –12:30 (incl. coffee break)
Lecture, assignment and discussion

5 Case selection and multi-method designs

09:00 –12:30 (incl. coffee break)
Lecture, assignment and discussion

Day Readings
2

Beach and Pedersen (2013)
Process Tracing: Foundations and Guidelines
Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Chapters 3 and 4

Machamer, Peter, Lindley Darden, and Carl F. Craver. 2000
Thinking about Mechanisms
Philosophy of Science 67(1): 1–25

Owen (1994)
How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace
International Security, Vol. 19, No. 2 (Fall 1994) pp. 87–125

1

Beach, Derek, and Rasmus B. Pedersen. 2013
Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines
Michigan: University of Michigan Press. Chapters 1 and 2

Bennett, Andrew, and Jeffrey T. Checkel. 2015
Process Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practices
In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, eds. Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–37

Brady, Henry E. 2008
Causation and Explanation in Social Science
In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, eds. Janet M Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E Brady, and Collier, David
Oxford, 217–70. Read to page 249 only

Gerring (2010)
Causal Mechanisms: Yes, But...
Comparative Political Studies, 43(11): 1499–1526

3

Goertz and Mahoney (2012)
A Tale of Two Cultures
Princeton: Princeton University Press, Chapters 10, 11, 13, pp. 127–149, pp.161–173

Beach and Pedersen (2016)
Conceptualisation chapter – to be provided

4

Collier, David. 2011
Understanding Process Tracing
Political Science & Politics 44(04): 823–30

Owen (1994)
How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace
International Security, Vol. 19, No. 2 (Fall 1994) pp. 87–125

Brast, Benjamin. (2015)
The Regional Dimension of Statebuilding Interventions
International Peacekeeping 22(1): 81–99

5

Beach and Pedersen (2016)
Case selection when studying mechanisms
Sociological Research methods

Ahmed, Amel, and Rudra Sil. 2012
When Multi-Method Research Subverts Methodological Pluralism – or, Why We Still Need Single-Method Research
Perspectives on Politics 10(4): 935–53

Literature

Beyond the above course literature

Beach, Derek, and Rasmus B. Pedersen (2016)
Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing
Michigan: University of Michigan Press

Brady, Henry E. & David Collier, eds. (2010)
Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards Second edition
Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield

George, Alexander L. & Bennett, Andrew (2005)
Case studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences
Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: MIT Press

Goertz, Gary, and James Mahoney (2012)
A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences
Princeton: Princeton University Press

Rohlfing, Ingo (2012)
Case Studies and Causal Inference: An Integrative Framework
New York: Palgrave Macmillan

Recommended Courses to Cover Before this One

Summer School

Case Study Research: Method and Practice

Logitudinal Research Designs – Qualitative Approaches

Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Fuzzy Sets

 

Recommended Courses to Cover After this One

Summer School

Expert Interviews for Qualitative Data Generation

Qualitative Data Analysis: Concepts and Approaches

Process Tracing Methodology in Practice

 

Winter School

Process Tracing Methodology in Practice

Advanced Multi-Method Research

Historical Methods for Social Scientists