Regulatory Governance and Its Legitimacy Problems (I): Expertise, Politicisation, and Populist Challenges

Abstract

To what extent and how does regulatory governance stay legitimate amid changing technological, economic, and political circumstances, the rise of populism and democratic backsliding, and scepticisms over established experts and expertise? Our two panels bring together scholars interested in the interactions between regulatory politics and democratic politics. The first panel looks at the role of technical expertise – a quality that has often been considered central to the legitimacy of the regulatory state – as well as other important qualities such as accountability, procedural fairness, and stakeholder engagement of regulatory agencies in tackling politicisation and populist challenges. The second panel examines how the role of the regulator and the instruments of governance are undermined or redefined as response to political and technological changes.

Title	Details
Sowing Seeds of Doubt: The Effects of Domestic Objection on the Citizens’ Perceived Legitimacy of EU Scientific Authority	View Paper Details
How do regulatory agencies acquire their reputation with their regulatees? A q-sort study of 10 regulatory agencies	View Paper Details
Contested Regulators: Politicizing Drug Rationing in Advanced Democracies	View Paper Details
Regulatory independence and technical expertise under populism: risk factors or protective barriers against illiberal attacks?	View Paper Details
Can Regulatory Governance rise to Challenge of Politics and Populism in the Post Crisis Era?	View Paper Details